SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Dante M. Alegre

Last decided Phoenix DowntownJul 2026
Decisions 3,901since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Dante M. Alegre reflect a significant volume of cases, providing a stable statistical baseline. When comparing the judge's latest-period approval rate of 31% against the Phoenix Downtown office's latest-period rate of 57%, a difference of -26 percentage points emerges. These figures are contrasted against the broader bench, where judges whose most recent office on record is this one show approval rates ranging from 32% to 78% since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 32%
Decisions on record 3,901
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Alegre Phoenix Downtown National
Approval rate 31% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 27% — —
Denials 69% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Alegre's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Alegre
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Dante M. Alegre has maintained a consistent decision pattern across 3,901 decisions on record. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuations, with rates reaching 41% in 2017 before trending toward the current 31% observed in the latest reporting period. This recent figure represents a continuation of the long-term average, suggesting a stable approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Alegre's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Phoenix Downtown hearing office

Dante M. Alegre's most recent office on record is the Phoenix Downtown hearing office, which serves you if you are in the surrounding area. With 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 57%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix Downtown

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, ranging from 32% to 78% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions