SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carla L. Waters

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,987 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's record requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Carla L. Waters maintains a lifetime approval rate of 45%, the Phoenix Downtown office bench shows a broad range of lifetime outcomes, from 32% to 78%. In the most recent reporting period, her approval rate was 47%, which is 10 percentage points lower than the office-wide average of 57%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 3,987
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Waters Phoenix Downtown National
Approval rate 47% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 20%
Denials 53%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Waters's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Waters
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Carla L. Waters has presided over 3,987 decisions. Her yearly approval trend has remained relatively steady, with annual rates fluctuating between 38% and 49% over the last decade. The most recent reporting period shows an approval rate of 47%, which is consistent with her long-term performance. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation, though each hearing remains unique based on the specific medical evidence you provide.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Waters's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Phoenix Downtown hearing office

The Phoenix Downtown hearing office serves you throughout the Arizona region. With a bench of 12 judges on record, this office manages a high volume of SSDI cases. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 57%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment. You can see the Phoenix Downtown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Phoenix Downtown hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 5 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. With lifetime approval rates across this bench ranging from 32% to 78%, the judge you draw can vary significantly. You can prepare for your hearing regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions