SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sara L. Alston

On record 507 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Sara L. Alston is based on 507 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of her historical decision-making patterns. When compared to the NHC Baltimore office-wide lifetime range of 40% to 90%, her record reflects a distinct approach to disability claims. These figures are derived from data collected since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 90%
Decisions on record 507

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Alston. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Alston's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Alston
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Sara L. Alston's record shows a consistent pattern of high approval rates throughout the available data window of 2016 to 2017. Starting with an 89% approval rate in 2016, the trend moved to 96% in 2017. This performance across 507 lifetime decisions suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence. The data reflects a sustained pattern of decision-making that has remained high over the course of her recorded tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Alston's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Baltimore hearing office

The NHC Baltimore hearing office serves claimants throughout Maryland and the surrounding region. It maintains a bench of 14 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal legal environment where evidence quality and medical documentation are the primary drivers of success. You can visit the NHC Baltimore hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges on record at this office since 2016. Across this bench, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 40% to 90%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions