SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Francine L. Applewhite

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nhc Falls Church Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 5,342 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Applewhite?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Francine L. Applewhite is calculated based on 5,342 lifetime decisions made during her tenure. When compared to the NHC Falls Church latest office average of 51%, her recent approval rate shows a variance of -23 percentage points. This data reflects a significant sample size, providing a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Applewhite Nhc Falls Church National
Approval rate 28% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 24%
Denials 72%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Applewhite's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Applewhite
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 4 years on the bench, the approval rate for Francine L. Applewhite has fluctuated, moving from 29% in 2016 to 42% in 2019. This pattern indicates that while her overall lifetime average is 28%, her recent decisions have trended upward compared to earlier years. Such shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Applewhite's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Applewhite? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nhc Falls Church hearing office

The NHC Falls Church hearing office serves you throughout the Northern Virginia region. This office manages a high volume of cases, with an office-wide latest approval rate of 51%. If you appear here, you can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can see the NHC Falls Church Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a random workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases to judges, meaning you have no control over which judge hears your claim. At the NHC Falls Church hearing office, the bench consists of 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 28% to 69%. Because rates vary so widely across the office, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions