SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul R. Armstrong

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,869 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for this judge are calculated based on 2,869 lifetime decisions. Within the NHC Chicago office, lifetime approval rates among the 14 judges on record range from 29% to 61%. Comparing these figures helps you understand the local judicial environment, though every case is unique. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 30%
Decisions on record 2,869

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Armstrong. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Armstrong's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Armstrong
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Paul R. Armstrong has shown a gradual upward trend. Starting at 24% in 2016, the rate reached 41% by 2020 before stabilizing at 40% in 2021. This pattern reflects a shift in outcomes over the 2,869 decisions on record. The recent data suggests a consistent approach to case evaluation compared to the earlier years of this record window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Armstrong's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Chicago hearing office

The NHC Chicago hearing office serves you throughout Illinois and the surrounding region. With 14 judges on record, this office manages a significant volume of disability hearings. You can expect a formal process where evidence quality is the primary factor in a favorable decision. You can see the NHC Chicago Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges on record at this office since 2016. With lifetime approval rates across the bench ranging from 29% to 61%, the specific judge assigned to your case can influence the process.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions