Brent T. Asseff's most recent office on record is Charlotte, with decisions there through July 2026. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, 89% of his 509 decisions were approvals. Across his 3,041 decisions on record since 2017, his approval rate is 83%. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The following table compares the approval rate of Brent T. Asseff to the performance metrics at the Charlotte hearing office, the state of North Carolina, and the national average. These figures are calculated over the 12-month window ending July 31, 2026. Comparing these rates provides context for how his recent decisions align with broader trends.
SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Asseff's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since December 2017, Brent T. Asseff has issued 3,041 decisions. His approval rate has fluctuated over this period, moving from 79% in 2018 to 91% in 2025, and settling at 89% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. This data reflects the total volume of decisions recorded since 2017.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Asseff's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Charlotte hearing office
The Charlotte hearing office is the most recent office on record for 18 judges as of July 2026. Over the 12-month window ending July 31, 2026, the office maintained an approval rate of 71%.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlotte
The Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly, meaning you do not choose your judge. Among the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is Charlotte, 9 decided cases here in SSA's latest file. These 9 judges range from 37% to 89% in their approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.
Judges with similar approval rates
These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Asseff's 89%. Three of them last decided cases in North Carolina. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Atlanta region.
- 85% Approval rate, last 12 months Randall D. Huggins
- 84% Approval rate, last 12 months Maria L. Spitz
- 84% Approval rate, last 12 months John A. Thawley
- 89% Approval rate, last 12 months Laura G. McHenry
- 88% Approval rate, last 12 months Ben E. Sheely
Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Asseff and the three closest side by side →
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the 9 judges active in the Charlotte hearing office's latest file range from 37% to 89% in approval rates. Brent T. Asseff's 89% rate is at the top of this range. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this hearing office.
His approval rate has varied since 2017, starting at 79% and reaching 89% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. An attorney can help you evaluate your case strategy based on these trends.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly to ensure efficiency. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing regardless of which judge is assigned.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. Your success depends on the medical evidence and documentation you provide. An attorney can help you ensure your case is fully prepared for the hearing.




