SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Daniel Balutis

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,301 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. While Daniel Balutis has a 27% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period approval rate of 29% sits 16 points below the current 45% average for the Wilkes Barre office. These figures are based on a docket of 3,301 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 27%
Decisions on record 3,301
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Balutis Wilkes Barre National
Approval rate 29% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 23%
Denials 71%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Balutis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Balutis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Daniel Balutis, spanning from 2016 to 2026, shows a consistent decision pattern. After an initial period of higher approvals in 2016, the rate stabilized and has remained steady in recent years. The latest-period approval rate of 29% aligns with this long-term trend, suggesting a predictable approach to case evaluation. This consistency helps in understanding how evidence is typically weighed in his courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Balutis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wilkes Barre hearing office

The Wilkes Barre hearing office serves you throughout Pennsylvania and the surrounding region. With a bench of 13 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 45%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Wilkes Barre Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. The Wilkes Barre office features 13 judges on record since 2016, 11 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. These judges have a wide range of lifetime approval rates, spanning from 27% to 57%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions