SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Frank Barletta

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,173 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to look at how a judge compares to their peers. At the Wilkes Barre office, lifetime approval rates among the 13 judges on record range from 27% to 57%. In the most recent reporting period, Frank Barletta maintained an approval rate of 46%, which is 1 percentage point higher than the office-wide average of 45%.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 4,173
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Barletta Wilkes Barre National
Approval rate 46% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 38%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barletta's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Barletta
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Frank Barletta has presided over 4,173 decisions. His yearly approval trend has remained relatively steady, fluctuating between a low of 43% in 2021 and a high of 52% in 2024. The most recent data shows a 46% approval rate, which aligns closely with his long-term historical average. This consistency suggests a stable approach to case evaluation, though recent outcomes may still be influenced by changes in the specific evidence or medical documentation presented in your claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barletta's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wilkes Barre hearing office

The Wilkes Barre hearing office serves you throughout the Pennsylvania region. It is staffed by 13 judges who manage a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 45% for the latest reporting period. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence provided in your file. You can see the Wilkes Barre Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at the Wilkes Barre office, 11 of whom reported data in the latest period. With lifetime approval rates across this bench ranging from 27% to 57%, the judge you draw can vary significantly in their historical patterns.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions