SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michele Stolls

Last decided Wilkes BarreJul 2026
Decisions 3,951since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When reviewing the data, it is helpful to compare your judge's performance against the broader bench at the Wilkes Barre hearing office. While your judge maintains a 56% approval rate on record since 2016, the office bench ranges from 27% to 57% over the same period. In the most recent reporting period, your judge's 44% approval rate sits 1 point below the office average of 45%. These figures are based on thousands of decisions, providing a clear statistical view of past activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 3,951
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stolls Wilkes Barre National
Approval rate 44% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 56% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stolls's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stolls
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your judge's approval rate has shown variation across the 3,951 decisions on record since 2016. After reaching a peak of 70% in 2018, the annual approval rate trended downward, reaching 44% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This recent figure represents a decline compared to the long-term average on record. Such fluctuations often occur due to changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence presented in a given year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stolls's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wilkes Barre hearing office

The Wilkes Barre hearing office is the most recent office on record for Michele Stolls as of July 2026. This office hosts a bench of 13 judges who handle a diverse range of disability claims. With an office-wide approval rate of 45% in the latest reporting period, you can expect a thorough review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Wilkes Barre

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Wilkes Barre hearing office, and 11 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 57% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions