SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Vincent Bennett

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,688 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Vincent Bennett maintains a 42% lifetime approval rate, his performance in the most recent reporting period shows a 37% approval rate. This sits against an office-wide lifetime range of 8% to 73% across all judges on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 2,688
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bennett Houston West National
Approval rate 37% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 63%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bennett's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bennett
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Vincent Bennett spans from 2016 to 2026, showing a varied approval trend over the last decade. After reaching a peak of 55% in 2022, the approval rate shifted, settling into a more recent range of 33% to 37%. This pattern suggests that the latest period reflects a continuation of a more conservative trend compared to his mid-career high. These fluctuations often stem from changes in the types of cases heard or the specific evidence presented in those dockets.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bennett's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Houston West hearing office

The Houston West hearing office serves claimants throughout the Texas region. It is staffed by a bench of 14 judges on record, maintaining an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 53%. Claimants can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 14 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 10 judges currently reporting in the latest period. With lifetime approval rates ranging from 8% to 73% across the bench, the judge you draw can influence your experience.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions