Kelly Matthews is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Houston West office. Over 10 years on the bench, they have issued 19,445 lifetime decisions with a 35% approval rate. This sits below the national average of 58%. The office's 3 ALJs range from 29% to 43% in lifetime approval rates. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
When evaluating your claim, it is helpful to look at how Judge Matthews compares to broader benchmarks. While the national approval rate currently sits at 58%, Judge Matthews has maintained a lifetime approval rate of 35% over 19,445 decisions. Comparing these figures to the Houston West office average of 56% provides context for the local hearing environment. These figures represent historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Matthews's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a 10-year tenure, the approval rate for Judge Matthews has seen notable shifts. After starting with a 57% approval rate in 2016, the trend moved downward, reaching 22% in 2023 before showing a recent uptick to 44% in 2025. This pattern reflects the evolving nature of caseloads and evidence requirements over time. The latest period shows a 40% approval rate, which suggests a departure from the lower rates observed in the preceding years.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Matthews's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing scheduled?
About the Houston West hearing office
The Houston West Hearing Office serves a large population of claimants across Texas. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases to ensure timely processing of disability appeals. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 56%, reflecting the local standards for evaluating complex medical and vocational evidence.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Houston West office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 29% to 55%. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare for your hearing.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
