Patrick Berigan is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Milwaukee hearing office. Over 7 years on the bench and 13,150 lifetime decisions, he has maintained a 54% approval rate. This is 4 percentage points above the current office average but 4 points below the national average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for this specific judge.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Patrick Berigan maintains a lifetime approval rate of 54% based on 13,150 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate was 4 percentage points higher than the Milwaukee office average, though it trailed the state and national averages by 4 percentage points. These figures provide a look at his historical decision-making, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Berigan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 7 years on the bench, Patrick Berigan has seen his approval rates fluctuate. After an initial rate of 61% in 2016, the rate trended to 49% in 2019 before reaching 58% in 2022. This recent trend indicates a return to higher approval levels compared to his mid-tenure period.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Berigan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing scheduled?
About the Milwaukee hearing office
The Milwaukee Hearing Office serves claimants across Wisconsin, managing a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 50%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Milwaukee bench, lifetime approval rates for the 6 judges range from 42% to 54%. The fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
