SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Laura Bernasconi

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 3,032 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's record requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Laura Bernasconi maintains a 61% lifetime approval rate, her performance in the latest reporting period shows a 62% approval rate. This latest figure sits 5 percentage points above the current Providence office average of 57%. These metrics provide a statistical baseline for your hearing, though they remain distinct from the specific evidence in your file.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,032
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bernasconi Providence National
Approval rate 62% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 52%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bernasconi's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bernasconi
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Laura Bernasconi spans 3,032 lifetime decisions beginning in 2017. Her approval trend has shown fluctuations over the years, moving from 65% in 2017 to 62% in 2026. This pattern suggests a steady approach to case evaluation, with the latest period remaining consistent with her long-term average. These yearly shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bernasconi's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Providence hearing office

The Providence hearing office serves you throughout Rhode Island and the surrounding region. As part of a busy regional network, this office manages a diverse caseload with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 57%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can see the Providence Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. The Providence bench includes 11 judges on record since 2016, with 6 judges currently reporting in the latest period. Approval rates across this office vary significantly, with lifetime records ranging from 32% to 75%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions