SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jason Mastrangelo

Last decided ProvidenceJul 2026
Decisions 4,156since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While Jason Mastrangelo has an approval rate of 44% since 2016, your latest-period approval rate is 45%, compared to the 57% office-wide average for the same period. With 4,156 decisions on record, this data provides a stable look at past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 4,156
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Mastrangelo Providence National
Approval rate 45% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mastrangelo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mastrangelo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Jason Mastrangelo has presided over 4,156 decisions. Your yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a low of 34% in 2017 and a high of 58% in 2023. The most recent fiscal year-to-date data shows an approval rate of 45%, which is below the office-wide latest-period average. This pattern suggests that while approval rates vary year-to-year, your recent activity remains within a consistent range.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mastrangelo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Providence hearing office

Jason Mastrangelo's most recent office on record is the Providence hearing office, which serves you across Rhode Island. This office is home to 11 judges who have recorded decisions since 2016, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 57%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Providence Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Providence

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Providence office, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file from July 2026. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 32% to 75% on their records since 2016. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions