SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul W. Goodale

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Providence Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,003 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Goodale?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Goodale has maintained a consistent presence in the Providence Hearing Office over his 10-year tenure. While his lifetime approval rate stands at 47%, recent reporting shows a 54% approval rate, reflecting a shift in his decision-making patterns. This data is drawn from a substantial docket of 22,003 lifetime decisions, providing a stable look at his judicial history compared to the 58% national average. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Goodale Providence National
Approval rate 47% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Goodale's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Goodale
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over the last decade, your judge's approval rate has shown a steady upward trajectory. Starting at 42% in 2016, the rate has gradually climbed to 56% in 2025. This trend suggests that the judge's recent approach to evidence and testimony may be evolving. While the latest period approval rate of 54% remains below the office average, the consistent growth indicates a shift in how cases are being evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Goodale's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Goodale? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Providence hearing office

The Providence Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Rhode Island and parts of the surrounding region. It is staffed by 6 administrative law judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 57%, which aligns closely with state averages.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Providence Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 32% to 74%. Because of this variance, understanding the office environment is as important as knowing your specific judge.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions