SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. V. Paul McGinn

Last decided ProvidenceSep 2021
Decisions 2,801since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the broader context of their hearing office. The 75% approval rate on record for V. Paul McGinn reflects a significant volume of cases decided since 2016. When compared to the 32% to 75% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Providence, these figures provide a baseline for understanding past outcomes. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 75%
Decisions on record 2,801

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge McGinn. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McGinn's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McGinn
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for V. Paul McGinn shows a gradual decline over the period from 2016 to 2021. Starting at an 80% approval rate in 2016, the figures shifted to 66% by 2021 across a total of 2,801 decisions on record. This pattern suggests a change in the mix of cases or evidence quality over time. Understanding this trend is helpful for your preparation, as it highlights the importance of presenting a robust medical record regardless of historical averages.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McGinn's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Providence hearing office

The Providence hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout Rhode Island and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data, there are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in a decision. You can see the Providence hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Providence

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Providence hearing office, there are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 75% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions