SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Barry H. Best

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,951 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Barry H. Best are calculated based on 1,951 lifetime decisions. When evaluating these figures, consider that the Providence hearing office bench maintains a lifetime approval-rate range between 32% and 75%. This context helps you understand how individual judicial patterns fit within the broader office environment. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 1,951

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Best. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Best's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Best
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Barry H. Best has shown a steady progression. After an initial approval rate of 38% in 2016, the figures trended upward, reaching 47% by 2019 before stabilizing in the mid-40s. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating the evidence presented in disability claims. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, providing a reliable reference point for your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Best's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Providence hearing office

The Providence hearing office serves you throughout Rhode Island, operating as a central hub for regional disability adjudications. The office maintains a bench of 11 judges who handle a wide variety of medical and vocational evidence. You can expect a professional environment focused on the rigorous evaluation of disability criteria. You can see the Providence Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Providence hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. With lifetime approval rates across the bench ranging from 32% to 75%, the judge you draw can influence the procedural flow of your case. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions