SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kenneth Bossong

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the South Jersey Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 4,157 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Bossong’s approval rate is evaluated against the latest performance metrics of the South Jersey Hearing Office and national benchmarks. With a lifetime record of 4,157 decisions, the data provides a clear view of historical trends. Currently, the judge’s approval rate tracks 6 points above the local office average and 18 points above the national average. These rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Bossong South Jersey National
Approval rate 76% 70% 58%
Fully favorable 65%
Denials 24%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bossong's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bossong
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Throughout a 2-year tenure, Judge Bossong has maintained a consistent approval rate of 76%. This stability is evident across the 4,157 lifetime decisions recorded. The yearly trend shows no significant deviation, suggesting a reliable approach to case evaluation. This consistency provides a predictable framework for how your evidence is weighed in this courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bossong's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Bossong? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the South Jersey hearing office

The South Jersey Hearing Office manages a high volume of disability claims through its 6-judge bench. The office currently reports a 70% approval rate, reflecting the local environment for SSDI hearings. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. See the South Jersey Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your specific judge is assigned randomly. Across the 6 judges at the South Jersey Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates vary, ranging from 49% to 76%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of the judge. You can find more information on the South Jersey Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions