SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kimberly Varillo

Last decided South JerseyJul 2026
Decisions 2,830since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context on how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. Kimberly Varillo's 78% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, sits above the 68% office average, the 63% state average, and the 58% national average for the same period. These figures rely on a docket of 457 decisions. These rates reflect past performance rather than a guarantee for your upcoming hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Varillo South Jersey National
Approval rate 78% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 71% — —
Denials 22% — —
Decisions 457 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 77%
Decisions on record 2,830

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Varillo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Varillo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2018, Kimberly Varillo has issued 2,830 decisions on record. Her yearly approval rate has fluctuated, reaching 86% in 2024 before moving to 78% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. Her recent 12-month rate is consistent with her overall record since 2018.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Varillo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the South Jersey hearing office

The South Jersey Hearing Office serves you and other claimants in the region. As of the most recent record in July 2026, this office maintains a bench of 13 judges, with 8 having active decisions in the latest SSA file. The office recorded a 68% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is South Jersey

The Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly, meaning you may be assigned to any judge at the office. Among the 8 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 45% to 81% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 8 of whom decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Varillo's 78%. Four of them last decided cases in New Jersey. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's New York region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Varillo and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions