SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nancy Lisewski

Last decided South JerseySep 2022
Decisions 2,380since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table displays the approval rate for Nancy Lisewski based on her 2,380 decisions on record since 2016. Because she is not in the most recent SSA file, this record provides the most complete view of her past decision-making. We compare this against the 53% to 80% range of the 8 judges currently active at the South Jersey Hearing Office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 2,380

Judge Lisewski is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Lisewski isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lisewski's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lisewski
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Nancy Lisewski has maintained a steady volume of decisions, with a total of 2,380 cases on record through 2022. Her yearly approval rate fluctuated during this period, starting at 50% in 2016 and reaching a high of 60% in 2021 before closing at 43% in 2022. The data shows no singular trend, as the annual percentages moved between 43% and 60% over the seven-year window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lisewski's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the South Jersey hearing office

The South Jersey Hearing Office serves you in New Jersey and is part of the broader regional network of Social Security Administration offices. With 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, it manages a significant volume of disability hearings. You can see the South Jersey Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is South Jersey

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the South Jersey Hearing Office, there are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 8 of them having decided cases in SSA's latest file. These 8 active judges range from 53% to 80% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions