SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Frederick Timm

On record 4,288 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Frederick Timm reflect a consistent history of decisions within the South Jersey office. When comparing the latest reporting period, your judge's 69% approval rate aligns with the office-wide average, while remaining 6 percentage points above the state and 11 points above the national average. These figures are based on 4,288 lifetime decisions, ensuring a robust sample size. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 4,288
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Timm South Jersey National
Approval rate 69% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 62%
Denials 31%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Timm's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Timm
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Frederick Timm has shown a steady pattern, with annual rates fluctuating between 62% and 76%. After a period of higher approvals between 2019 and 2021, the most recent data shows a return to a 69% approval rate. This latest period reflects a continuation of a stable decision-making trend, suggesting that your judge maintains a consistent approach to evaluating your disability evidence.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Timm's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the South Jersey hearing office

The South Jersey hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 13 judges on record. The office currently reports a 69% approval rate for the latest period, reflecting the collective output of its active judges. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the South Jersey Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench range from 50% to 93% over their respective lifetimes. You can find more information on the South Jersey hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions