Solomon Boyle is an ALJ at the Houston-Bissonnet hearing office. With a lifetime approval rate of 50% over 12,934 decisions, Solomon Boyle sits below the national average of 58%. Because case assignment is random, understanding your judge's history is a vital part of your preparation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Boyle maintains a lifetime approval rate of 50%, a figure derived from 12,934 decisions across his tenure. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate of 49% trailed the Houston-Bissonnet office average of 56% by 6 percentage points and the national average of 58% by 8 percentage points. This data provides a statistical baseline for your hearing preparation.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Boyle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over 8 years on the bench, Judge Boyle has demonstrated a consistent decision-making pattern. While his annual approval rates have fluctuated—ranging from a low of 44% in 2019 to a high of 55% in 2023—the overall trend remains steady. The latest period's 49% approval rate is closely aligned with his long-term career average. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Boyle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing scheduled?
About the Houston-Bissonnet hearing office
The Houston-Bissonnet Hearing Office serves a large population of applicants across the region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases to address the needs of local residents. The office-wide latest approval rate is 56%, reflecting the broader environment in which your hearing occurs. You can visit the Houston-Bissonnet Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Boyle is essentially random. Across the Houston-Bissonnet bench, the 6 ALJs have lifetime approval rates ranging from 44% to 72%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain constant.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
