SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Maryann S. Bright

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,847 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Maryann S. Bright maintains a 51% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows a 54% approval rate, which sits 1 percentage point below the Norfolk office average of 55%. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,847 lifetime decisions, providing a reliable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,847
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bright Norfolk National
Approval rate 54% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 35%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bright's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bright
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Maryann S. Bright has remained relatively steady since 2016, though it has experienced minor fluctuations over the years. Following a period of lower approvals in 2025, the most recent data indicates a return to a 54% approval rate. This latest period reflects a continuation of her long-term trend, suggesting that her approach to evaluating evidence remains consistent. These patterns provide a helpful baseline for understanding how your case may be evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bright's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk hearing office serves claimants throughout the Virginia region. With 12 judges on record, this office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 55%. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality and medical documentation are the primary drivers of your hearing outcome. You can see the Norfolk Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the latest period, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 48% to 60%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the bench, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions