Maryann S. Bright is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Norfolk hearing office. Across the 3,847 decisions on record since 2016, 51% have been approved. The office's judges range from 48% to 60% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your specific case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Maryann S. Bright maintains a 51% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows a 54% approval rate, which sits 1 percentage point below the Norfolk office average of 55%. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,847 lifetime decisions, providing a reliable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bright's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The decision pattern for Maryann S. Bright has remained relatively steady since 2016, though it has experienced minor fluctuations over the years. Following a period of lower approvals in 2025, the most recent data indicates a return to a 54% approval rate. This latest period reflects a continuation of her long-term trend, suggesting that her approach to evaluating evidence remains consistent. These patterns provide a helpful baseline for understanding how your case may be evaluated.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bright's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Norfolk hearing office
The Norfolk hearing office serves claimants throughout the Virginia region. With 12 judges on record, this office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 55%. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality and medical documentation are the primary drivers of your hearing outcome. You can see the Norfolk Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the latest period, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 48% to 60%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the bench, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Maryann S. Bright maintains a lifetime approval rate of 51%, which falls within the 48% to 60% range observed across the 12 judges on record at the Norfolk office. While her latest-period rate of 54% is slightly below the office average of 55%, it remains competitive. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific nuances of this judge's courtroom.
Maryann S. Bright's approval rate has seen fluctuations since 2016, ranging from a low of 42% in 2025 to a high of 55% in 2020. Despite these yearly shifts, her lifetime average of 51% suggests a consistent approach to case evaluation. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might impact your specific case.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot choose your judge, an attorney can help you prepare a strong case that meets the evidentiary standards of any judge at the Norfolk office.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where the judge reviews your medical evidence and may hear testimony from you and vocational experts. The goal is to determine if your impairment meets the criteria for disability benefits. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your medical records to ensure your case is presented clearly.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions and not a guarantee of a future outcome. While Maryann S. Bright's 51% lifetime rate provides context, the success of your case depends primarily on the strength of your medical evidence and how well you meet the SSA's disability requirements. An attorney can help you evaluate your evidence and build a compelling case for your hearing.



