SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Chad Gendreau

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Norfolk Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,068 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Gendreau?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. While the national average approval rate is 58%, Judge Gendreau has maintained a 55% lifetime approval rate. This data is drawn from a docket of 20,068 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Gendreau Norfolk National
Approval rate 55% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 50%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gendreau's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gendreau
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Gendreau has demonstrated a steady decision-making pattern. After his first year, his annual approval rates have consistently hovered near the 55% mark. The latest reporting period shows a 50% approval rate, which aligns closely with his long-term career average. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating your medical documentation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gendreau's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Gendreau? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk Hearing Office serves a significant population across Virginia, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a team of 6 ALJs, the office maintains an environment focused on processing complex medical evidence. You can expect a professional hearing process designed to evaluate the specific limitations of your impairment. You can visit the Norfolk Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the 6 judges at the Norfolk Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates range from 49% to 55%. Because every judge brings a unique perspective to the courtroom, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions