SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carol Matula

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 3,468 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The Norfolk hearing office features a bench where judges have lifetime approval rates ranging from 48% to 60%. In the most recent reporting period, Carol Matula recorded an approval rate of 47%, which compares to the office-wide latest-period rate of 55%. These figures provide context for the local environment, though your specific outcome depends on the unique medical evidence in your file. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 3,468
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Matula Norfolk National
Approval rate 47% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 38%
Denials 53%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Matula's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Matula
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2017, Carol Matula has presided over 3,468 lifetime decisions. Her yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a high of 53% in 2017 and 2024, with other years remaining near the 49% lifetime average. The most recent data indicates a rate of 47%, which is consistent with the broader patterns observed throughout her time on the bench. This trend suggests a stable approach to case evaluation over the last several years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Matula's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a central hub for Virginia disability hearings. The office maintains a professional environment where judges handle a diverse range of medical and vocational claims. With a bench of 12 judges on record, the office processes a high volume of cases annually. You can see the Norfolk Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Norfolk hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 7 judges currently reporting in the latest SSA data. With an office-wide lifetime approval range of 48% to 60%, you may encounter different decision patterns depending on your assignment. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions