SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carol Matula

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Norfolk Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 20,042 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. While the national average approval rate is 58%, Judge Matula's latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 51%. This data is drawn from a docket of 20,042 lifetime decisions, offering a look at her history. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Matula Norfolk National
Approval rate 49% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 36%
Denials 49%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Matula's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Matula
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 9-year tenure, Judge Matula has presided over 20,042 lifetime decisions. Her approval rate shifted after 2017, moving from 58% to a more moderate range where it has largely remained. Recent data shows a latest-period approval rate of 51%, which aligns closely with the Norfolk Hearing Office average. This trend suggests a stable approach to case evaluation that has persisted throughout her time on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Matula's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Matula? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk Hearing Office serves a broad population across Virginia, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an environment where case outcomes are influenced by the evidence presented in your file. The office's latest approval rate of 51% reflects the regional complexity of claims processed in this area. You can view the Norfolk Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Norfolk Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 49% to 55%. Because each judge operates with their own judicial style, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful. You can find more information on the Norfolk Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions