Michael Carr's most recent office on record is the NHC Albuquerque, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 2,032 decisions on record since 2016, 31% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 31% to 61% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 31% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, while latest-period data offers a snapshot of current trends. Within the NHC Albuquerque office, the bench shows a range of 31% to 61% for approval rates on record since 2016. These figures are derived from a significant volume of decisions, providing statistical context for your hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Carr's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The record for Michael Carr spans from January 2016 to July 2026, covering 2,032 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 29% in 2016 to 34% in 2025, followed by a partial-year rate of 75% in 2026. The latest reporting period shows a 100% approval rate, which diverges from the long-term average. This recent activity reflects a shift compared to the historical pattern observed since 2016.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Carr's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the NHC Albuquerque hearing office
The NHC Albuquerque is the most recent office on record for Michael Carr, with data current through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 45%, providing context for local hearing outcomes.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Albuquerque
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Albuquerque, and 6 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary, ranging from 31% to 61% on their since-2016 records.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Michael Carr has a 31% approval rate on record since 2016. This is at the lower end of the 31% to 61% range observed among the 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Albuquerque. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this bench.
The approval rate for Michael Carr has varied over the years, starting at 29% in 2016 and reaching 34% in 2025, with a partial-year rate of 75% in 2026. These shifts are based on 2,032 decisions on record. A qualified attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific case.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases randomly to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot choose your judge, working with an attorney to prepare a strong case is the best way to ensure you are ready for any hearing.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical evidence and testimony. You will likely be asked about your work history and physical or mental limitations. Having an attorney can help you organize your medical records and prepare your testimony for the hearing.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. While Michael Carr has a 31% approval rate on record since 2016, your outcome depends primarily on the medical evidence and documentation supporting your disability claim. An attorney can help you build the strongest possible case.




