SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kerith Cohen

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Norfolk Hearing Office · 7 years on the bench · 12,451 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Cohen?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Cohen maintains a lifetime approval rate of 56% based on 12,451 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, this judge approved cases at a rate 5 points higher than the Norfolk Hearing Office average and 4 points higher than the state average. These figures provide context for your hearing, though they represent past trends rather than a guarantee of your outcome.

Metric Judge Cohen Norfolk National
Approval rate 56% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 44%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cohen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cohen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 7-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has shifted. Early in the career, rates were higher, reaching 66% in 2016, before transitioning to a range between 52% and 57% through the middle years. The most recent data indicates a rate of 47% in 2022. These fluctuations often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific medical evidence presented during those periods.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cohen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Cohen? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk Hearing Office serves a significant population across Virginia, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 51%. You can expect a formal administrative process governed by 20 CFR Part 404 when you appear for your hearing.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Norfolk Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 49% to 56%. Because every judge operates within the same regulatory framework, the core requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of the specific judge assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions