SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kimberly S. Cromer

Last decided ColumbusJul 2026
Decisions 4,369since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While you see a 64% approval rate across all decisions since 2016, recent data shows a 73% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure sits 10 percentage points above the Columbus office's latest-period rate of 63%, 18 points above the state average, and 15 points above the national average. These figures reflect past decisions rather than predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 4,369
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Cromer Columbus National
Approval rate 73% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 66% — —
Denials 27% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cromer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cromer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Kimberly S. Cromer spans 4,369 decisions from January 2016 through July 2026. The yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a mix of highs and lows before reaching a 73% approval rate in the most recent partial fiscal year. This latest period reflects an uptick compared to the historical average on record. These patterns provide insight into how cases have been handled over the last decade, though each hearing remains unique.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cromer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbus hearing office

Kimberly S. Cromer's most recent office on record is the Columbus hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across Ohio as part of a regional network of hearing sites. With 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Columbus

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 34% to 83% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions