SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeannine Lesperance

Last decided ColumbusJul 2026
Decisions 3,271since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's overall approval rate on record since 2016 is 49%, recent data provides a more immediate look at current trends. In the latest reporting period, your judge's approval rate was 52%, compared to the 63% office average, 55% state average, and 58% national average. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 3,271
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lesperance Columbus National
Approval rate 52% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 48% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lesperance's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lesperance
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your judge's approval rate has fluctuated since 2016. After a peak in 2020 and 2022, the rate saw a decline in 2023 and 2024 before showing an uptick in the most recent partial fiscal year of 2026. This variation highlights the importance of case-specific evidence. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, with your judge's recent 52% approval rate showing a shift from the previous year's figures.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lesperance's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbus hearing office

Jeannine Lesperance's most recent office on record is the Columbus hearing office, which serves claimants across Ohio. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 63%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical and vocational evidence presented in your case.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Columbus

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Columbus hearing office, there are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, from 34% to 83% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions