SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. B. D. Crutchfield

On record 3,055 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's record to their peers helps you understand the local landscape of the Social Security Administration hearing process. At the Tulsa OHO, lifetime approval rates among the 15 judges on record range from 37% to 81%. This variance highlights why your specific judge assignment matters for your case strategy. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,055

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Crutchfield. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Crutchfield's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Crutchfield
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

B. D. Crutchfield's record covers 3,055 decisions made between 2016 and 2021. The yearly approval trend shows a period of relative stability, with rates fluctuating between 56% and 68% over the course of the data window. The most recent data from 2021 indicates a 68% approval frequency. This pattern reflects the judge's historical approach to evaluating disability claims based on the evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Crutchfield's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tulsa OHO hearing office

The Tulsa OHO serves you if you are in Oklahoma, operating as a critical hub for regional disability hearings. The office maintains a diverse bench of 15 judges who manage a high volume of cases. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your claim. You can see the Tulsa OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 15 judges on record at the Tulsa OHO since 2016, with 6 currently reporting in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, spanning from 37% to 81% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions