SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David W. Engel

Last decided Tulsa OHOJul 2026
Decisions 4,173since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, David W. Engel's 88% approval rate compares to a 62% office average, 68% state average, and 58% national average. Since 2016, David W. Engel has issued 4,173 decisions with an 80% approval rate, which sits within the 43% to 80% range of the 6 judges who decided cases at this office in SSA's latest file.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Engel Tulsa OHO National
Approval rate 88% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 71% — —
Denials 12% — —
Decisions 269 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 80%
Decisions on record 4,173

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Engel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Engel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, David W. Engel has issued 4,173 decisions. The yearly approval rate has moved from 72% in 2016 to 90% in 2026. While the rate fluctuated between 73% and 86% in the intervening years, the most recent 12 months sit above the record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Engel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tulsa OHO hearing office

The Tulsa OHO is the most recent office on record for David W. Engel, with activity documented through July 2026. The 6 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file maintained an office-wide approval rate of 62% over the 12-month window ending July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tulsa OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tulsa OHO, 6 judges decided cases here in SSA's latest file. These 6 judges range from 47% to 88% in their approval rates over the 12-month window.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Engel's 88%. Two of them last decided cases in Oklahoma. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Dallas region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Engel and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions