Lantz McClain is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Tulsa hearing office. Across the 2,392 decisions on record since 2016, 38% have been approved. The office's judges range from 37% to 81% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's record to their peers helps you understand the local landscape of disability hearings. At the Tulsa hearing office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 81%. These figures are derived from thousands of cases, providing a look at how different judges approach the evidence presented in your claim.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge McClain. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McClain's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The record for Lantz McClain spans from 2016 to 2020, covering 2,392 lifetime decisions. During this period, your approval rate showed a relatively steady trend before experiencing a decline in the final year of the data window. Understanding this trajectory can be useful when you organize your medical evidence and prepare your testimony.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McClain's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Reading this because a claim was denied? Decode the letter — what the sentence means, what to file, and by when.
About the Tulsa hearing office
The Tulsa hearing office serves you throughout Oklahoma, operating as a hub for regional disability determinations. With 15 judges on record, the office manages a diverse caseload and maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a formal proceeding where the quality of your medical documentation is the primary factor in the outcome.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 15 judges on record at this office since 2016. Because approval rates across the office range from 37% to 81%, knowing the tendencies of the local bench is a standard part of your hearing preparation.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Lantz McClain has a lifetime approval rate of 38%, which sits at the lower end of the 37% to 81% range observed among the 15 judges on record at the Tulsa office. Because every case is unique, this rate is a reflection of past trends rather than a guarantee of your specific outcome. An attorney can help you understand how to present your medical evidence to best address the requirements of this specific bench.
The data shows that Lantz McClain maintained a relatively steady approval rate between 2016 and 2019, followed by a decrease in 2020. While these trends provide context, they do not dictate the outcome of your future hearing. If you are concerned about how these patterns might affect your claim, an attorney can help you prepare a strategy that focuses on the specific strengths of your medical evidence.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration uses a random assignment algorithm to distribute cases among the judges at the Tulsa hearing office. Since you cannot control your assignment, working with an attorney is the best way to ensure you are ready for the hearing regardless of which judge is presiding.
An SSDI hearing is a non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony about your functional limitations. You will likely be questioned by the judge and potentially a vocational expert about your ability to perform work. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions and ensure your medical records are complete before your hearing date.
A judge's lifetime approval rate is a statistical observation of past performance, not a prediction for your specific case. While Lantz McClain's 38% rate is part of the local context, the most important factor in your hearing is the quality and consistency of your medical evidence. An attorney can help you identify gaps in your documentation and build a stronger case for your benefits.



