SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark R. Dawson

Last decided DenverSep 2019
Decisions 1,749since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 54% approval rate for Mark R. Dawson reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 31% to 75% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Denver hearing office. With 1,749 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 1,749

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Dawson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dawson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dawson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mark R. Dawson showed fluctuation across the 1,749 decisions on record since 2016. The rate was 55% in 2016, 58% in 2017, 52% in 2018, and 51% in 2019. These variations reflect changes in the complexity of the cases or the evidence presented during your hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dawson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

The Denver hearing office serves you across Colorado and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data, 22 judges have their most recent record at this location. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where the focus remains on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your claim.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Denver

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Denver hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 31% to 75% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, the specific judge assigned to your case is a significant factor.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions