Collin Delaney is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the NHC Falls Church office with a lifetime approval rate of 66% across 1,915 decisions. This sits above the national median of 58% and is 15 percentage points higher than the local office average. While these statistics provide a helpful baseline, remember that aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for this specific judge.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Delaney maintains a lifetime approval rate of 66%, a figure derived from 1,915 lifetime decisions. When compared to recent data, his approval rate sits 15 percentage points higher than the NHC Falls Church office average and 8 percentage points above the national average. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Delaney's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 2 years on the bench, Judge Delaney has maintained a steady approval rate. Data from 2018 and 2019 shows a consistent 66% approval rate, indicating a stable approach to case evaluation. This pattern suggests that his decision-making process is well-defined.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Delaney's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Delaney? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Nhc Falls Church hearing office
The NHC Falls Church hearing office serves you throughout the Virginia region, managing a high volume of disability cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 51%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the specific medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the NHC Falls Church office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 69%. Because every judge approaches evidence differently, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
