SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. O. P. Dodson

Last decided NorfolkSep 2021
Decisions 2,351since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing an approval rate requires looking at consistent data windows. We evaluate O. P. Dodson's 54% approval rate against the performance of the broader bench at the Norfolk hearing office, where peers range from 48% to 60% on their since-2016 records. This comparison provides context for how individual decision patterns align with local office trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 2,351

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Dodson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dodson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dodson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for O. P. Dodson remained steady throughout the record window of January 2016 to September 2021. Starting at 57% in 2016, the annual approval rate saw minor fluctuations before settling at 53% in 2021. With 2,351 total decisions on record, the data shows a consistent approach to case evaluation over this period. This steady pattern suggests a stable decision-making history.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dodson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk hearing office serves claimants across the region as a hub for disability hearings in Virginia. This office features a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative process governed by federal regulations. You can see the Norfolk hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Norfolk

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Norfolk hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 48% to 60% since 2016. While individual judges may have different approaches to evidence, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions