SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Charles A. Dominick

Last decided Wilkes BarreJul 2026
Decisions 3,043since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

To understand how your case might be evaluated, it is helpful to compare the judge's performance against the broader bench. While the office-wide approval rate for the latest period sits at 45%, this judge's latest-period approval rate is 52%. This data is derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a statistical baseline for the office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 3,043
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Dominick Wilkes Barre National
Approval rate 52% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 48% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dominick's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dominick
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since November 2017, this judge has issued 3,043 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows a period of stability followed by an increase in 2022 and 2023, before returning to a more moderate level in the most recent fiscal year. While the latest-period approval rate of 52% is lower than the peak years, it remains consistent with the long-term average. This pattern suggests that the approach to evidence has remained steady over the observed window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dominick's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wilkes Barre hearing office

The Wilkes Barre hearing office serves claimants across Pennsylvania and is part of a regional network of SSA offices. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, which recorded an office-wide approval rate of 45% during the latest reporting period. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical and vocational evidence at this office.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Wilkes Barre

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Wilkes Barre hearing office, 11 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 27% to 57% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions