SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Elizabeth Ebner

Last decided NHC Falls ChurchSep 2025
Decisions 2,588since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Elizabeth Ebner is based on 2,588 decisions since 2016. When compared to the broader bench at the NHC Falls Church office, where approval rates for the 33 judges range from 29% to 85%, Ebner's record sits within the established local variance. These figures reflect historical data rather than a guarantee of future outcomes. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 2,588

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ebner. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ebner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ebner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Elizabeth Ebner has shown a varied trend, beginning at 43% and reaching 68% in 2025. With 2,588 decisions on record, the data indicates a judge who has maintained a steady approach to case evaluation over the last decade. The fluctuations observed are common in complex disability dockets.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ebner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Falls Church hearing office

The NHC Falls Church office serves as the most recent office on record for Elizabeth Ebner as of September 2025. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims, with a bench of 33 judges who have recorded decisions there since 2016. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and vocational history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Falls Church

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 33 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Falls Church, with approval rates ranging from 29% to 85%. Because case assignment is outside of your control, understanding the general environment of the office is more useful than focusing on a single peer. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions