SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kathleen H. Eiler

Last decided OrlandoSep 2023
Decisions 1,551since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Kathleen H. Eiler is calculated based on 1,551 decisions on record since 2016. This figure is best understood when compared to the broader bench at the Orlando hearing office, where judges range from 34% to 89% in their own since-2016 records. These statistics provide a probability cloud based on historical data rather than a specific prediction for your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 1,551

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Eiler. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eiler's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Eiler
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Kathleen H. Eiler has fluctuated across the 1,551 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of relative stability, the data shows a varied trend with annual approval rates shifting between 36% and 48% during the primary years of the record. The most recent data from 2023 represents a limited number of decisions, which can cause significant variance compared to the long-term average. This pattern suggests that your case outcome remains sensitive to the specific evidence presented in your file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eiler's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orlando hearing office

The Orlando hearing office serves you and other claimants across central Florida and is part of a region with a high volume of disability claims. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, reflecting a diverse bench with varying historical approval patterns. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical records and vocational history. You can see the Orlando Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orlando

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orlando hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 34% to 89% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence and documentation. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions