SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Glenn M. Embree

Last decided Atlanta DowntownSep 2021
Decisions 2,256since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table displays the approval rate for Glenn M. Embree compared to the bench at the Atlanta Downtown hearing office. These figures are based on the total number of decisions on record since 2016. The data reflects a volume of 2,256 decisions, which helps establish a statistical baseline for this profile. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 86%
Decisions on record 2,256

Judge Embree is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Embree isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Embree's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Embree
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Glenn M. Embree's approval rate is calculated from 2,256 decisions on record between 2016 and 2021. The yearly trend shows an approval rate of 89% in 2016, 87% in 2017, 89% in 2018, 86% in 2019, 84% in 2020, and 74% in 2021.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Embree's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown hearing office serves you if you are in the region. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with the last recorded decision for Glenn M. Embree at this location occurring in September 2021. You can expect a standard hearing process at this office, where your evidence and testimony are evaluated against federal disability criteria. See the Atlanta Downtown hearing office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta Downtown

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Approval rates vary across the office's bench, with the 9 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file ranging from 47% to 70% on their since-2016 records. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 9 of whom decided cases here in SSA's latest file. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions