SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lowell Fortune

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Denver Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 3,164 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Fortune?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Fortune maintains a lifetime approval rate of 46%, which differs from the 62% average seen at the Denver Hearing Office and the 58% national average. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 3,164 lifetime decisions, offering a stable view of past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Fortune Denver National
Approval rate 46% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 39%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fortune's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fortune
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 2-year tenure, Judge Fortune has maintained a consistent decision-making pattern. The data shows a shift from a 47% approval rate in 2016 to 45% in 2017. This trend reflects a steady approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation. These trends provide insight into the judge's historical consistency over their time on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fortune's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Fortune? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

The Denver Hearing Office serves a broad population across Colorado, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 62%. You can expect a professional environment where medical evidence is the primary focus of the hearing process. You can see the Denver Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the Denver Hearing Office, the 6 ALJs range from 45% to 62% in their lifetime approval rates. While these variations exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent regardless of who presides over your hearing.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions