SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Thomas J. Gaye

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the San Jose Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 6,758 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Gaye?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Gaye currently tracks 5 points above the national average of 58% and 5 points above the San Jose office average. These figures are derived from a significant volume of 6,758 lifetime decisions, offering a reliable look at historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Gaye San Jose National
Approval rate 63% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 37%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gaye's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gaye
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 4-year tenure, Judge Gaye has shown a consistent approach to disability claims. While early years saw approval rates as high as 66%, the most recent data indicates a shift toward 55% in the final reporting period. This trend suggests a nuanced evolution in how evidence is weighed, potentially influenced by changes in case complexity or medical documentation standards. Understanding this trajectory helps you and your representative focus on the most persuasive elements of your claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gaye's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Gaye? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Jose hearing office

The San Jose Hearing Office serves a diverse population across California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 58%, consistent with national trends. You can expect a professional environment focused on the rigorous evaluation of medical evidence and vocational testimony. See the San Jose Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the San Jose Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 78%. This variance highlights why your specific case presentation is the most critical factor in your hearing. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions