SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edmund E. Giorgione

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Columbus Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 1,663 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Giorgione?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Giorgione maintains a lifetime approval rate of 54%, which provides a baseline for understanding his decision-making history. When compared to the Columbus Hearing Office latest average of 57% and the national average of 58%, his record reflects his approach to the evidence presented in your disability claim. These figures are derived from a docket of 1,663 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Giorgione Columbus National
Approval rate 54% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Giorgione's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Giorgione
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his tenure on the bench, Judge Giorgione has maintained an approval rate of 54%. This is observed across his 1,663 lifetime decisions, suggesting a stable approach to evaluating your medical evidence and vocational testimony. His record shows a consistent pattern of adjudication, which helps you and your representative anticipate the evidentiary standards required for a favorable outcome.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Giorgione's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Giorgione? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbus hearing office

The Columbus (Ohio) Hearing Office serves a broad population across the region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 57%. You should expect a formal process focused on the specific medical documentation and vocational factors relevant to your claim. You can see the Columbus Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is random. At the Columbus Hearing Office, the bench consists of 6 judges whose lifetime approval rates range from 49% to 68%. This variance highlights why thorough preparation is critical, regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions