SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stewart Goldstein

Last decided NorfolkSep 2019
Decisions 1,115since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. Stewart Goldstein's 52% approval rate on record since 2016 can be viewed alongside the 48% to 60% range established by other judges whose most recent office on record is the Norfolk hearing office. With 1,115 decisions on record, this data provides a stable look at past performance. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 1,115

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Goldstein. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Goldstein's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Goldstein
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Stewart Goldstein has shown variation across his 1,115 decisions on record since 2016. After an approval rate of 54% in 2016, the figures shifted to 49% in 2017 and 55% in 2018, before a partial-year record of 43% in 2019. These fluctuations are common in SSDI dockets and often reflect shifts in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented. This trend pattern suggests that your outcome remains sensitive to the specific medical documentation you provide.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Goldstein's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as part of the broader SSA administrative network. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 55%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the focus is on the medical evidence supporting your claim. You can see the Norfolk hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Norfolk

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Norfolk hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 48% to 60% on their since-2016 records. While these figures vary, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent across the bench. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions