E. Norman Graham's most recent SSA record (September 2019) is at the Greensboro hearing office. Across the 1,216 decisions on record from 2016 through 2019, 89% were approvals. The 8 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 52% to 85% on their since-2016 records. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
This table displays the approval rate for E. Norman Graham based on his total decisions on record since 2016. We compare this figure against the range of other judges who have decided cases at the Greensboro office in SSA's latest file. These statistics rely on 1,216 total decisions to provide a clear view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.
Judge Graham is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Judge Graham isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Graham's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
E. Norman Graham decided 1,216 cases between 2016 and 2019. His approval rate showed a steady upward trend during this period, beginning at 86% in 2016 and reaching 91% by 2019. This pattern reflects the consistent outcomes observed across his total record on file. The data captures these decisions as they occurred, providing a historical view of his activity at the Greensboro office.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Graham's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Greensboro hearing office
The Greensboro hearing office serves you across North Carolina and the surrounding region. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 8 of them having decided cases here in SSA's latest file. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Greensboro
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Approval rates vary across the Greensboro bench, with the 8 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file ranging from 52% to 85% on their since-2016 records. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 8 of whom decided cases here in SSA's latest file.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
E. Norman Graham's 89% approval rate on record through 2019 sits above the 52% to 85% range observed among the 8 judges who decided cases at the Greensboro office in SSA's latest file. An attorney can help you understand how these differences might impact your specific hearing strategy.
E. Norman Graham's approval rate showed a steady trend from 2016 through 2019, moving from 86% to 91% over that period. This reflects the historical data on his 1,216 decisions. An attorney can help you evaluate how to present your evidence regardless of these past trends.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, making the assignment process random. An attorney can help you prepare for a hearing before any judge assigned to your case.
An approval rate is a probability based on past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. Your outcome depends primarily on the medical evidence and vocational factors in your file. An attorney can help you ensure your case is prepared to meet the necessary legal standards.




