James N. Gramenos's most recent SSA record (January 2016 to September 2016) is at the Detroit hearing office. Across the 203 decisions on record since 2016, 69% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 25% to 75% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Evaluating an approval rate requires looking at the volume of cases decided. With 203 decisions on record since 2016, the data for James N. Gramenos provides a look at his past activity. You can compare this to the broader bench at the Detroit office, where judges range from 25% to 75% in their approval rates over the same period. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Gramenos. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gramenos's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for James N. Gramenos is based on 203 decisions on record since 2016. During the recorded window of January 2016 through September 2016, the data shows an approval rate of 69%. This figure represents the total allowance rate across all decisions finalized during that specific timeframe.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gramenos's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Detroit hearing office
James N. Gramenos's most recent SSA record (September 2016) is at the Detroit hearing office. This office serves the Michigan region and is staffed by a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. While the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 57%, your individual outcome depends on the specific evidence presented in your file.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Detroit
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Detroit office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 25% to 75% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
James N. Gramenos has an approval rate of 69% based on 203 decisions on record since 2016. This places him within the range of 25% to 75% seen among the 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Detroit office. An attorney can help you understand how your specific case evidence aligns with these historical patterns.
The data for James N. Gramenos covers the period from January 2016 to September 2016, during which he maintained a 69% approval rate across 203 decisions. Because the data window for this judge is limited to 2016, there is no multi-year trend to compare. If you are concerned about your hearing, an attorney can help you prepare your case.
No. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. You cannot choose your judge, which is why it is important to be prepared for any ALJ. An attorney can help you build a strong case regardless of who is assigned to your hearing.
A hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You, your attorney, and potentially a vocational or medical expert will discuss your ability to perform work-related tasks. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific questions you may face during this process.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. While James N. Gramenos has a 69% approval rate on record since 2016, your result will depend on the medical evidence and testimony provided. An attorney can help you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your claim.




