SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James N. Gramenos

Last decided DetroitSep 2016
Decisions 203since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating an approval rate requires looking at the volume of cases decided. With 203 decisions on record since 2016, the data for James N. Gramenos provides a look at his past activity. You can compare this to the broader bench at the Detroit office, where judges range from 25% to 75% in their approval rates over the same period. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 203

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Gramenos. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gramenos's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gramenos
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for James N. Gramenos is based on 203 decisions on record since 2016. During the recorded window of January 2016 through September 2016, the data shows an approval rate of 69%. This figure represents the total allowance rate across all decisions finalized during that specific timeframe.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gramenos's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Detroit hearing office

James N. Gramenos's most recent SSA record (September 2016) is at the Detroit hearing office. This office serves the Michigan region and is staffed by a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. While the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 57%, your individual outcome depends on the specific evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Detroit

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Detroit office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 25% to 75% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions