Christine A. Guard's most recent office on record is the Macon hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 1,972 decisions on record since 2016, 57% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 31% to 72% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your specific case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing Christine A. Guard's performance requires looking at consistent data periods. While the judge has a 57% approval rate across all decisions since 2016, recent trends show a 64% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 18 percentage points above the Macon office average of 46%. These metrics provide a statistical baseline for your hearing, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than individual outcomes.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Guard's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, Christine A. Guard has issued 1,972 decisions. After a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2019, the approval frequency has seen a consistent rise, reaching 64% in the most recent reporting period. This latest-period performance indicates a shift from the historical average, suggesting that recent case outcomes have been more favorable. This trend reflects a pattern of stability in how evidence is weighed over time.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Guard's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Macon hearing office
The Macon hearing office serves claimants across Georgia and is a key hub for regional disability adjudications. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office maintains an overall latest-period approval rate of 46%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Macon
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Macon office, there are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 7 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 72% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Christine A. Guard's latest-period approval rate of 64% is notably higher than the Macon office's latest-period average of 46%. While this suggests a variance, every case is unique and depends on the specific evidence presented. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's bench.
Yes, the approval rate has fluctuated over the 1,972 decisions on record since 2016. While the historical average is 57%, the judge has seen an upward trend in recent years, reaching 64% in the latest reporting period. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific claim.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because assignment is random, it is vital to have an attorney who can help you prepare for any judge at the Macon office.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be questioned by the judge or a vocational expert about your ability to perform work. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and ensure your medical evidence is clearly presented.
An approval rate is a statistical observation of past decisions, not a guarantee of your outcome. While Christine A. Guard's 57% rate since 2016 provides context, the strength of your medical evidence remains the most important factor. An attorney can help you evaluate your case's strengths and weaknesses.




