SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Whitfield Haigler Jr.

On record 3,804 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure the data is meaningful. While the lifetime approval rate for Whitfield Haigler Jr. sits at 84%, his latest-period performance shows a 98% approval rate, which stands 34 points above the Dallas North OHO average of 64%. These figures are derived from 3,804 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 84%
Decisions on record 3,804
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Haigler Jr. Dallas North OHO National
Approval rate 98% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 89%
Denials 2%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Haigler Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Haigler Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval record for Whitfield Haigler Jr. shows a clear upward trend since 2016. Starting at 70% in 2016, the approval rate has climbed steadily, reaching 98% in the most recent reporting period. This pattern indicates a consistent shift in outcomes over the last decade. The recent high approval rate reflects a continuation of this long-term trend toward higher allowance frequencies.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Haigler Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dallas North OHO hearing office

The Dallas North OHO serves claimants across the Texas region, managing a high volume of disability hearings. With 20 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 64%. You can expect a structured environment where evidence quality remains the primary driver of your success. For more information, see the Dallas North OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. There are 20 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 24% to 88% over their respective lifetimes. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions