SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Charles Walters

On record 4,253 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Charles Walters reflect a significant volume of cases heard at the Dallas North OHO. When comparing these figures to the office-wide lifetime range of 24% to 88%, the data provides a clear view of how this judge's decisions align with local trends. These statistics are based on 4,253 lifetime decisions, ensuring a robust sample size for analysis. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 88%
Decisions on record 4,253
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Walters Dallas North OHO National
Approval rate 86% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 79%
Denials 14%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Walters's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Walters
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval pattern for Charles Walters has shown a steady trajectory. While the rate experienced a period of adjustment between 2021 and 2022, recent data shows a return to higher approval levels, with an 85% rate in the most recent reporting period. This latest performance remains strong compared to the broader office, state, and national benchmarks. The recent trend reflects a continuation of this established pattern in case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Walters's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dallas North OHO hearing office

The Dallas North OHO serves claimants across Texas, operating as a critical hub for disability hearings in the region. The office maintains a diverse bench of 20 judges on record, with a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 64%. You can expect a formal process focused on the evaluation of your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Dallas North OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 24% to 88% on a lifetime basis. You can find more information on the office's roster on the hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions