SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark Kim

Last decided Dallas North OHOJul 2026
Decisions 3,945since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Mark Kim's 52% approval rate is measured against the Dallas North OHO office rate of 63%, the Texas state rate of 56%, and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline derived from his 395 decisions during this period.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kim Dallas North OHO National
Approval rate 52% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 38% — —
Denials 48% — —
Decisions 395 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,945

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kim's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kim
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Mark Kim has issued 3,945 decisions on record. His approval rate has varied over this period, with the most recent 12 months sitting near his 51% approval rate recorded across his entire record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kim's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dallas North OHO hearing office

The Dallas North OHO serves you in Texas and is part of the broader SSA regional hearing network. With 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, it handles a significant volume of disability claims. The office recorded a 63% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Dallas North OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Dallas North OHO, 11 decided cases here in SSA's latest file. These 11 judges range from 20% to 98% in their approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Kim's 52%. All five last decided cases in Texas.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Kim and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions