SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jacqueline Y. Hall-Keith

Last decided Oak ParkSep 2024
Decisions 2,082since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Jacqueline Y. Hall-Keith is based on 2,082 decisions made between 2016 and 2024. This figure is compared against the performance of other judges at the Oak Park office who have active records in the latest SSA file. These statistics provide a broad view of historical trends across the bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 83%
Decisions on record 2,082

Judge Hall-Keith is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Hall-Keith isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hall-Keith's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hall-Keith
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Jacqueline Y. Hall-Keith's record spans 2,082 decisions from 2016 through 2024. The yearly approval rate shows fluctuations, reaching a high of 90% in 2021 before shifting to 75% in 2023 and 88% in 2024. This data reflects the total volume of cases decided over the observed period. The most recent 2024 data sits above the 2023 level, continuing the pattern of annual variance observed since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hall-Keith's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park Hearing Office serves you in Michigan and the surrounding region. This office has a bench of 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where the focus remains on the medical and vocational evidence you present. See the Oak Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Park

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Approval rates vary significantly across the Oak Park bench. The 9 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 40% to 81% on their since-2016 records. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 9 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions